| Home Back
to:
Articles |
TECHWORKPLACE
by Jeffrey L. Berger, Esq.
Jeffrey L. Berger specializes in management-side employment and business law, and related litigation in
Washington, D.C., and nationally. Questions and comments on the TECHWORKPLACE are
encouraged. Other articles are available at www.bergerlaborlaw.com.
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS IN THE
FAST LANE
|
 |
Concerned calls from
high tech executives to employment law attorneys lately follow three related patterns: 1)
the executive wants to set up his own company and take other employees, 2) a key employee
is about to join a competitor, or 3) the executive has just been "asked to
resign." The attorneys first question is likely the same: Is there an
employment contract and what does it say about competition, confidentiality, and ownership
of intellectual property? Given the growth and change rate in the high-tech industry, and
the rapid mobility of its employees, misunderstandings over these employment-related
rights are spawning increasing disputes. Many companies, especially start-ups, complicate
matters by adopting employment agreements borrowed from friends, other employers, or form
books. Many employees simply sign these contracts at orientation sessions with the same
level of thought given to their W-4 forms.
A comprehensive employment agreement can be viewed in three phases: 1)
what the employee brings and may not bring to the relationship, 2) the rights and
obligations of the parties during employment, and 3) the rights and obligations when
employment ends. In the entry phase, the new employer should make sure there are no
existing restrictions on the employee from non-competition, trade secret, or other
obligations. A new employer may be held liable for contract interference and related
violations if it hires or uses information from an employee restricted by a former
employers contract. The new employer should require an employee to declare whether
she owns any inventions or ideas, as the employer will want to own anything she produces
concerning the business.
During the employment phase, employers should have employees disclose
and assign all business-related inventions, ideas, and rights. Most companies will want
employees to protect confidential information, as an employer must retain and enforce
confidentiality requirements to be entitled to protection by trade secret laws. The scope
of what is protected is the source of frequent litigation, due in part to the shotgun
approach to confidentiality in many employment agreements.
The true test of an effective employment agreement comes when it is time
to part ways. If the employer had the leverage to hire on an at-will basis, disputes over
firing are minimized. In high tech, however, professionals and executives often have the
leverage to obtain the right to severance and vesting of options, unless they are fired
"for cause." Equally important is ownership of various rights, the restriction
of which can significantly affect the employers ability to protect its business and
the departing employees right to work. Included are the former employees
ability to compete with, hire employees, solicit customers, or use confidential
information of the former employer. Contrary to popular belief, properly drawn
non-competition and related restrictions are enforceable, particularly in IT, bioscience,
and other industries dependent upon employee ideas and knowledge. Departing employees, and
especially executives and professionals, are frequently shocked to find that the
employment agreement they signed without thinking when hired restricts them from working
in their chosen industry. Moreover, even where an agreement is unclear, litigation over
competition and related issues can effectively chill a former employees ability to
work or start a new venture.
A recommended New Years resolution for employers and employees
alike: read your companys employment contract. You may be pleasantly surprised or
shocked, depending on your plans in the new millennium.
© 1999 Jeffrey Berger
REPRINTED FROM:
TECHGAZETTE - December 1999, Vol. 2, No.12
The Berger Law Firm, P.C. 1825 Eye St. N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C.
20006.
Phone: (202) 861-1361 Fax: (202) 861-1362
Legal advice is case specific and is not intended to be provided by this article.
The Berger Law Firm, P.C. may not be held responsible for any consequences
that may arise in connection with the use of or reliance on the information provided.
|